Which incidents must be documented as Use of Force?

The correct response emphasizes the importance of documenting any incident that exceeds basic control techniques, specifically categorizing these events as "Use of Force." This classification includes a range of situations where an officer’s actions are more forceful than verbal commands or physical presence. Incidents that warrant documentation typically include actions such as striking, grappling, or using specialized techniques that go beyond mere verbal warnings or foundational control methods (like Soft, Empty-Hand Control).

Proper documentation is critical because it provides a record of the circumstances that required increased force, which can be used for both accountability and review purposes. It helps to ensure that all uses of force are transparent and that appropriate responses are analyzed in accordance with policies and regulations. This approach aligns with training and standards in law enforcement that strive for clarity and professionalism in the use of force scenarios.

In comparison, the other options either relate to less significant actions, such as verbal warnings or routine physical restraint, or do not encompass the broader spectrum of forceful encounters that necessitate thorough documentation. Thus, focusing on incidents that go beyond basic control methods provides a more comprehensive and responsible framework for use of force documentation.