Can an EPA be held for an employee who is the principal of an open misconduct investigation?

The reasoning for supporting that an Emergency Protective Action (EPA) can be held for an employee who is the principal of an open misconduct investigation is grounded in the need for maintaining safety and the integrity of the investigation process.

In situations where a misconduct investigation is underway, the well-being of staff, other inmates, and facility safety may necessitate implementing an EPA regardless of the individual's involvement in the investigation. This preventive measure is crucial to mitigate risks, especially if the allegations involve serious offenses that could threaten the environment within the facility or the safety of individuals present.

While it's important to adhere to established protocols and procedures, the ability to place an employee under an EPA serves as a necessary safeguard, allowing authorities to act swiftly to protect all parties involved. Establishing the grounds for an EPA under these circumstances demonstrates an organization's commitment to accountability and responsible management in potentially volatile situations.